In the BBC article Creating and Designing Your Own Print Ads, the author suggests that
With the wide availability of computers and design programs, it is now possible to be your own design agency. With attention to detail you, too, can produce your own professional-looking advertisements.
With the wide availability of building materials I could build my own house, but that doesn’t mean it wouldn’t fall down. The suggestion that someone should try and produce their own print ads instead of focusing on their business and what they do best is absurd. Not only do you have the expense of buying additional software, you then have to learn how to use it and finally hope to goodness that you have a thimble of talent somewhere in your body. After much expense, several headaches and many many hours of hard work you might just get lucky and come out with something good. If your business doesn’t go bust in the mean time, you might just get away with it.
Alternatively, you could pay a modest amount to a professional designer or agency with years of study, experience and skill under their belts to spend just a couple of hours doing it for you. Whilst they’re doing that, you can concentrate on running your business and looking after your own customers.
Unless design happens to be your business, the choice is obvious. Design agencies don’t exist for fun – they serve a valuable purpose in an image-driven world. Trying to do your own design is not only daft, it’s a false economy. With the purchases, the hours and the better work your are neglecting, it simply has to end up costing more than just having the work done professionally. You wouldn’t want me to come and build you a house.
I feel like I’m on an article bitch-trip today. Ho hum.



Comments
But ya, this is a common problem with anything that has to do with computers. Sure anyone can design and build a professional webpage.. but should they?
Marketting engines for software companies do not help.. look at Macromedia or Adobe. They promise the world..
At least us tech spods can get away with just doing the job as most sane people fear the code!
:)
Give someone a copy of dreamweaver and they think they can do anything.
—John Ruskin (1819-1900)
It often seemed to me that clients felt they were being negligent in their duty if they didn’t ask for at least one change/mod to a design. Rarely did I hear a client say, ”Perfect! Let’s go with it.”
My fellow designers and I distilled this tendency down to the following directive:
”Make it more...um...shite. And change the font.”
To follow on Drew’s analogy:
The difference between designers and carpenters is that carpenters aren’t usually asked to remove a supporting column so that the light and color in the front room will be better. Or if they are, the ”account bods” don’t compel them to comply.
NOTE: My web site is, ironically, missing a few supporting columns.
Unfortunately, this is the norm. And color is just one, small aspect of web/ design. Like a lot of things, if it’s on a computer, then their little cousin can just pick up a copy (stolen) of DW and Photoshop, and then, by golly, should be able to do the job, right? Good grief!
Also...
”Quark is the most powerful desktop publishing program available”
Heh, I am not saying bad things about quark, but I would like to get my hands on a version of quark that could be described as ”most powerful”.
Otherwise I would pick on more, but if I picked on everything this would be an essay.