Jason Kottke talks about stealing bandwidth on a recent trip like it’s no big issue. Is it a big issue? To me, stealing someone’s bandwidth is just as much stealing as anything else. You intentionally deprive them of the bandwidth and, once used, you can’t give that back. You don’t know how that bandwidth is billed, either.
The closest analogy I can think of is seeing that someone has left their front door ajar, going into their house unnoticed and helping yourself to water from the tap. Is that such a big crime? Probably not, but how would you feel about someone sneaking into your house and doing that?
I should imagine the attitude would be different if the shoe was on the other foot. (what a weird expression that is).
Footnote: I’m not judging Kottke for his actions – I just think it raises an interesting issue.
Further footnote: re-reading Kottke’s post, I’m not certain whether the open network was left open intentionally or not. Either way, as I said, I’m not judging anyone here…
Comments
Stealing bandwidth is bad but if someone has left a network open with no authetication anywhere on the system is it a public network? Probably not because we know that is no different that the silly person who leaves the keys in the ignition of their unlocked car. But I don’t really feel sorry for either person.
Depends on how you are used to using WiFi as well. If you are involved with group that has open access points in places and you are under the impression that if it is an open network you are free to use (assuming all those who set up a WAP know what they are doing) then you can hardly blame him for using an open network. There are no clear ’rules’ with WiFi, maybe someone should write a charter for WiFi? hehe that could be an ’ask slashdot.’
most people know to keep their doors shut - most should have the common sense to keep their wifi secure. if not, it should be assumed they understand the risk of not securing their wifi, and are willing to deal with the consequences.
i say use it.